Top
Pines Federal Pines Federal
Don’t Face the Federal Government Alone 832-462-7655

Is Your Federal PIP Unfair or Disciplinary?

My Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) Seems Unfair. Is It a Disguised Disciplinary Action?

For thousands of dedicated federal employees, receiving a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) induces instantaneous anxiety. Supervisors often present PIPs as supportive tools for professional growth. In reality, a PIP is a step that an employer has to take before disciplining or even removing the employee from their position.

If your PIP seems unfair, it can indicate that your performance plan is little more than disguised disciplinary action.

At Pines Federal, we understand how a PIP can be a means to quietly build the paper trail needed to justify termination. Intervention during the PIP stage can protect you from unfair demotion or removal. If you’ve been placed on a PIP, you should always speak with a federal employment lawyer who can help protect your rights and your career.

Key Takeaways involving Federal Employee PIP

  • A PIP is a formal notice that identifies alleged performance deficiencies and sets measurable goals to be achieved within a specific time period, often 30 to 90 days
  • Many agencies use PIPs as justification for later removal, creating a record they can later cite to justify discipline under 5 U.S.C. § 4303
  • Warning signs of a bad-faith PIP include vague expectations, unrealistic metrics, false claims about your performance, lack of constructive feedback, and supervisors refusing to provide the resources necessary for improvement
  • Federal employees have rights detailed under the Civil Service Reform Act and Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), regulations that our attorneys often use to challenge unfair (and even retaliatory) performance actions
  • An experienced federal employment lawyer will review your PIP for defects and indications of unfairness, then propose a personalized plan for protecting you

The Lowdown on Federal Performance Improvement Plans

A Performance Improvement Plan is designed to provide federal employees with an opportunity to meet performance expectations before an agency takes disciplinary action. At least, that is the official narrative.

While these plans are typically described in positive terms - such as “assisting employees in improving their performance” - a PIP may be nothing more than a thinly veiled step towards demoting or removing the employee.

These plans:
 

  • Typically outline specific “critical elements” of the position the employee occupies
  • Detail areas where performance allegedly falls short
  • Provide a limited timeframe for improvement.

However, in many federal workplaces, a PIP does not function as a genuine opportunity. Instead, the PIP functions as a test the agency expects you to fail. In fact, the conditions of a PIP may even be impossible for you to meet.

When federal employee lawyers analyze PIPs for indications of unfairness, the standard elements of the PIP we evaluate are:

  • The specific “critical elements” of the job that you are allegedly failing to meet
  • The defined period (generally between 30 and 90 days) to show improvement
  • Stated benchmarks or productivity requirements
  • Identification of a supervisor or reviewer who will assess progress
  • A warning that failure to meet expectations may result in removal or demotion

While these features are “standard, "the PIP-drafting process can involve representatives of the Human Resources office, a supervisor, and Employee Relations staffers. Having multiple hands involved in the process can result in a complicated PIP, and the PIPs of two employees may look substantially different. One of our federal employment attorneys will review your PIP, identify any potential issues or concerns, and provide guidance on how to proceed.

Why Federal Employees Are Often Placed on PIPs Before Removal

When a PIP seems unfair or appears to be designed for the employee to fail, consider that your supervisor is likely using the PIP as part of the documentation process. Their intent may be to demote or remove you, and issuing you an impossible PIP may be a formality that leads to more serious disciplinary action.

Why would a supervisor, or anyone else, go through the trouble of dealing with a PIP only to demote or fire an employee?

In many cases, federal supervisors must demonstrate that performance-based actions are supported by documentation and due process. A PIP serves that purpose. The PIP may allow an agency to claim that the employee received a “chance to improve,” even when the outcome was explicitly designed for the employee to fail.

At Pines Federal, we routinely see patterns where employees are placed on PIPs even after years of successful service and glowing evaluations. Some scenarios that might prompt the weaponization of a PIP against a federal employee are:

  • Conflicts with management or refusal to conform to office politics
  • Retaliation for Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) complaints or whistleblower disclosures
  • Management changes that present new performance or personnel-related expectations
  • Strained interpersonal relationships with supervisors
  • Legitimate performance issues that are exaggerated to justify a personnel action

Legislation, including but not limited to the No FEAR Act, is meant to protect whistleblowers and other federal employees who might be unjustly demoted or removed. Our attorneys leverage these laws to protect federal employees, as the law itself does not always provide sufficient protection.

Possible Signs That a PIP Is Designed for the Employee to Fail

The difference between a legitimate PIP and a disguised disciplinary action lies in both intent and execution. When you consult an employment lawyer, they will evaluate your PIP for red flags, including:

  • Vague or subjective standards that cannot be objectively measured
  • Unrealistic deadlines
  • A lack of resources or training necessary to complete assigned tasks
  • Limited or no feedback during the PIP period
  • Hostile interactions or comments suggesting removal may be inevitable
  • Sudden, unexplained poor evaluations following years of positive ratings
  • Timing that seems retaliatory, such as after you have filed an EEO or whistleblower complaint

Often, we can identify a motive that explains why the federal employee is facing an unfair PIP.

Legal Protections During the PIP Process

Disciplinary actions against federal employees must be in accordance with the law. Put simply, you have the right to be spared from unfair, unjust discipline.

Federal employees enjoy legal protections that private-sector workers do not. The Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA) requires agencies to provide both notice and a genuine opportunity to improve before taking adverse action based on performance.

The law also ensures that federal employees cannot be removed or demoted without substantial evidence that their performance was unacceptable and that they were given a reasonable chance to correct deficiencies. Our federal employment attorneys are students of these laws, and we put the law into action when federal employees become victims of unfair persecution, demotion, and removal.

How One of Our Federal Employment Lawyers Can Help You Overcome an Unjust PIP

We have found that early legal intervention can drastically alter the outcome of a PIP for the better. Our federal employment attorneys understand the intricate regulations governing agency procedures, and we can help you by:

  • Reviewing and analyzing the PIP for flaws, signs of bias, and unrealistic expectations placed on you
  • Comparing the stated performance deficiencies with previous performance reviews
  • Demanding clarity from your superiors where goals are vague or overly subjective
  • Ensuring the agency provides proper feedback and support throughout the PIP process
  • Advising you about documentation practices, such as keeping copies of assignments, supervisor communications, and witness statements
  • Identifying all retaliation or discrimination indicators
  • Negotiating modifications to PIP terms that make the plan achievable

Our representation will enable you to take control of the PIP process, rather than you becoming the victim of hostile, unfair agendas by those who may be seeking to demote or remove you from your position.

When Our Clients Face Proposed Removal or Demotion, We Step Up to Protect Them

If the agency you work for determines that you “failed” to meet the expectations of the PIP, it may issue a Notice of Proposed Removal or Notice of Proposed Demotion under 5 U.S.C. § 4303.

At this stage, you will be entitled to review the evidence supporting the proposed action. You, with our critical assistance, can then submit a written or oral reply (or both) before a public official renders their decision about your demotion or removal.

Your attorney will assist you during this high-stakes process by:

  • Drafting a detailed written response addressing every alleged deficiency
  • Highlighting any procedural violations that tainted the PIP process
  • Drawing attention to mitigating factors (like medical conditions, workload increases, denied resources) that entitle you to grace and leeway
  • Exposing inconsistencies between management’s documentation and your actual professional performance
  • Negotiating settlements or last-chance agreements that preserve employment, reputation, and eligibility for retirement benefits

We know that when an agency is faced with a well-documented, legally sound rebuttal, it will change its decision in the employee’s favor.

We Appeal Like Our Clients’ Jobs Depend on It

If the agency proceeds with proposed demotion or removal despite the employee’s reply, the next step is to appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). This is the administrative tribunal that reviews adverse actions against federal employees.

The MSPB process is complex and time-sensitive, and our attorneys have successfully completed this process many times. Appeals must typically be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the removal or demotion, and we assist clients with their appeals by:

  • Filing a timely appeal to preserve all procedural defense options
  • Conducting discovery, which may entail obtaining agency emails, internal notes, witness testimony, and other documentation
  • Cross-examining supervisors about the creation and management of the PIP
  • Presenting documentation and witness statements proving your satisfactory performance
  • Arguing legal defenses such as lack of substantial evidence, procedural error, or bad-faith implementation
  • Pursuing reinstatement, back pay, attorney’s fees, and other remedies justified by the unjust harm you have suffered

Even if you do not want to be reinstated, the appeals process can lead to favorable settlements and other favorable outcomes.

Settlement Options and Alternative Outcomes That Can Benefit Federal Employees

Litigation is not always the sole option for federal employees who are mistreated by their employers. Experienced attorneys often negotiate resolutions that protect the employee’s financial security and career trajectory, such as:

  • Reassignment to another position or division
  • Resignation (which may afford you benefits that a removal does not)
  • Restoration of pay and benefits
  • Correction of personnel records to remove harmful notations
  • Monetary compensation for wrongful or retaliatory actions

These outcomes often preserve Federal Employee Retirement System (FERS) benefits, security clearances, and future eligibility for federal employment. Your lawyer will evaluate the unique circumstances you face. They will draw up a personalized case strategy tailored to achieve the best possible outcome for you.

Frequently Asked Questions - Your PIP Seems Unfair

While federal employees have robust legal protections, exercising those protections requires wading through complex laws and processes. It’s only natural to have questions, and you may be wondering:

Can an agency issue a PIP without prior counseling or feedback?

Agencies are encouraged, and often required, to provide counseling or assistance before initiating a PIP. Failing to do so can demonstrate bad faith and may render later disciplinary action invalid.

What if I believe my PIP is retaliation for EEO or whistleblower activity?

If the PIP comes in response to protected activity, such as filing an EEO complaint or reporting misconduct, you may have a claim under 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b). One of our lawyers can help file any necessary OSC complaint or pursue a mixed-case appeal combining performance and discrimination issues.

How much time do I have to appeal my removal?

You generally have 30 calendar days from the effective date of the removal or demotion to file an MSPB appeal. Missing this deadline (or other deadlines related to your PIP) can cause you to forfeit your priceless right to fight unfair employment decisions.

Call Pines Federal Today to Discuss Your PIP (and How Our Team Will Enforce Your Rights as a Federal Employee)

A Performance Improvement Plan can be more than just a warning or attempt to help you improve as an employee. A PIP can be a calculated, disguised measure to protect the agency in advance of your demotion or removal from your position.

We exclusively represent federal employees in defending against unfair employment practices. Our federal employment lawyers can help you respond to a PIP intelligently and urgently, preventing your employer from forcing you out of your job.

Don’t wait until your agency moves to remove or demote you—the earlier you act, the stronger your case becomes. Call Pines Federal today at (800) 801-0598 or contact us online to speak with an experienced federal employment attorney.